2017 News Stories
Charles Dorn visits USF, gives historical perspective on 'crisis' in higher education

Bowdoin College Professor Charles Dorn, Ph.D., discussed a historical perspective on higher education and the challenges it faces today during a visit to the USF College of Education.
by Abby Rinaldi
There is a crisis in higher education.
At least, that鈥檚 what people are saying. As debates rage over tuition costs, student
               debt, curriculum, academic freedom and other hot-button topics, it might seem as though
               the end of higher education is near.
However, Bowdoin College Professor , Ph.D, isn鈥檛 buying that idea. Dorn discussed this crisis in education and the history
               of higher education in a lecture at the USF College of Education in October.
In his presentation, Dorn discussed a historical perspective on higher education and
               the challenges it faces today, topics he writes about in his book 鈥.鈥 Taking his listeners on a journey through higher education by turning a lense to
               some of its most trying times, he spoke of the U.S. of 1900, a nation that had just
               recovered from a severe economic recession and experienced dramatic social and political
               unrest, a situation that triggered what one might call a crisis in colleges and universities.
鈥淪o what does this crisis look like?鈥 Dorn said. 鈥淭uition costs are on the rise, leading
               some to fear that higher education is becoming a bastion of the privileged and the
               elite. The proportion of men enrolled in the nation鈥檚 colleges and universities is
               declining and that鈥檚 leading some institutions to take the radical step of imposing
               a cap on women鈥檚 enrollment. 
"Controversies over academic freedom are erupting on campuses across the United States
               and they鈥檙e being widely reported on in the press. Leading business figures have voiced
               concerns that students aren鈥檛 learning a whole lot, or at the very least that what
               they鈥檙e learning is irrelevant to the job market, especially in such rapidly changing
               and unsettled times. And all of this is causing quite a few Americans to wonder if
               a university diploma is still worth the cost.鈥
Higher education has been through many mini-revolutions in its past, Dorn said. Each
               time Americans turned a critical eye to established colleges and universities, new
               types of institutions were born.
鈥淎ll of the institutions that we鈥檙e familiar with today actually grew out of shortcomings,
               both real and perceived, in the kinds of colleges and universities that came before
               them,鈥 he said.
Colleges and institutions in the U.S. have always faced tension in their goals and
               missions, Dorn said. For all, there is the idea of private advancement for the students.
               On the other, the institutions claim to work for the common good.
鈥淥ur institutions exist to provide an education that directly relates to our students鈥
               futures, including their future occupations, while simultaneously existing for the
               purpose of advancing the common good, and not students鈥 private advantage,鈥 Dorn said.
               鈥淵ou can call that a tension. You can call it a contradiction. You can call it a paradox
               鈥 but that is the essence of higher education in America.鈥
This idea is articulated in the founding of Bowdoin College, alongside the institutions
               of Georgetown and South Carolina College (modern day University of South Carolina),
               Dorn said. These institutions had a curriculum that was primarily classical, a pedagogy
               based primarily around memorization and recitation and a highly regulated student
               life.
These institutions slowly became more selective and expensive over time. People began
               to question the curriculum and pedagogy of these established institutions and, not
               willing to wait decades for these institutions to integrate these demands, they made
               new institutions.
These new institutions, Dorn said, were practical in their curriculum. They focused
               on education in agriculture, mechanics, mining and the military. These new schools
               included Agricultural College of the State of Michigan (modern day Michigan State)
               and California State Normal School (modern day San Jose State).
After the Civil War, Dorn said, commercialism rose in the U.S. and higher education
               changed as a result. When Stanford University was founded, at the time tuition was
               free, but the university was also the first in the nation to establish a College of
               Business and to begin commercializing intercollegiate athletics.
New institutions were founded also to serve previously excluded groups. Howard University
               arose to provide education to African Americans. The all women Smith College provided
               women with four-year bachelor鈥檚 degrees.
After World War II, another large change took place, Dorn said. College enrollment was
               up 227 percent and one-third of 18-24 year old Americans were enrolled in college.
               Community colleges start popping up all across the U.S. It is around this time, in
               1956, that USF was founded as the first school designed to serve non-traditional urban
               commuter students. Dorn said it also provides an illustration of the accomplishments
               and tensions of the U.S. at that time.
鈥淵ou鈥檝e got a Cold War communist witch hunt on campus,鈥 he said. 鈥淵ou鈥檝e got conflicts
               over racial segregation and integration, and that鈥檚 particularly interesting at USF,
               because USF was often compared to 91社区鈥檚 other public higher education institutions
               when it came to racial segregation and integration. You鈥檝e got anti-Vietnam War protests.
               You鈥檝e got free speech protests at USF. You鈥檝e sort of got the whole range of events.鈥
USF was also caught in the tensions of a university attempting to serve the public
               good and the vocational training demands of its student population. Founding president
               John Allen had a civic-minded vision for the university while the students overwhelmingly
               expressed a desire for vocational training.
鈥淎merican higher education is characterized by institutional transformation, reform
               and change,鈥 he said. 鈥淭here鈥檚 this constant concern that higher education must meet
               the needs of students in terms of access and affordability and relevance and certainly
               preparation for future employment, but there is a shared concern across time that
               these institutions meet the needs of the common or the public good,鈥 he said.
Clifford Weyrauch, a social studies education doctoral student at USF, drove from
               Ocala after work to attend Dorn鈥檚 lecture. He approached Dorn afterwards to ask about
               the direction of community colleges as they start to offer higher levels of education
               than they did in the past.
鈥淚t seems like, talking to him, I get a better understanding of maybe this is the
               model for community colleges in the future,鈥 Weyrauch said.
Chad Garcia, a doctoral student in the Educational Innovation program, said he thought
               the survey of history Dorn explored in his lecture was eye-opening.
鈥淚 thought it was a fascinating way to look at the way the university systems and
               the way that the community colleges have evolved over time and how seeing some of
               the challenges that they鈥檝e faced in the past (are) still some of the challenges that
               we see today,鈥 Garcia said.
At the end of his lecture, Dorn revisited the current crisis of American higher education.
               He sees problems, he said, but ones the country has seen before. He remains unconvinced,
               he said, that this is the end of higher education in the U.S.
鈥淎s long as higher education continues to maintain this commitment to the common good,
               these institutions are going to produce more than 鈥 I think 鈥 just knowledge that鈥檚
               going to lead to the next great technological innovation or a workforce that successfully
               competes in a global marketplace,鈥 he said. 鈥淚 think that these places are going to
               become increasingly important over time. They will continue to foster personal advancement,
               but I think also they will continue 鈥 to promote the common good in some fundamental
               way. As long as they do that, I think they will continue to be relevant institutions
               in American society.鈥